Obasanjo’s eight years worse than Abacha’s – Ribadu
Pioneer chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, EFCC, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu allegedly described corruption under
President Olusegun Obasanjo as worse than that of late General Sani Abacha, according
to United States cable obtained by Wikileaks.
The report released by Wikileaks stated that a meeting
which the former US Ambassador to Nigeria, Robin Sanders had with Mallam Ribadu
to discuss his removal from the EFCC, Ribadu told the US ambassador that
Obasanjo was good at covering his tracks while admitting that corruption was
worse under Obasanjo. Ribadu was quoted as saying that former President
Obasanjo knew how to play the game. “Although he created the EFCC and
understood its importance for him with the international community, Ribadu
explained, that by far and even more than the Abacha days, corruption under
Obasanjo’s eight years was far worse.
See extracts of the cable below:
Classified by Ambassador Robin Sanders for Reasons 1.4
(b, c, & d).
1. (S) Summary: Ambassador had 4-hour private
discussion with Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Chairman (EFCC) Mallam
Nuhu Ribadu on the evening of December 28 at her residence to hear his views on
the recent announcement that he will be transferred from the EFCC to the
country’s leadership school, the National Institute for Policy and Strategic
Studies (NIPSS). Ribadu took the opportunity to cover not only the politics
behind this move, but also spent several hours discussing a range of EFCC pending
cases that he wanted to share, including his personal views on Yar’Adua, former
President Obasanjo, recently indicted former Delta State Governor Ibori, and
the illicit enrichment open cases on the Police Inspector General Mike Okiro
and Attorney General Aondoakaa.a
It seemed that he wanted someone outside of the EFCC to know
the details of active investigations as a possible failsafe given the current
negative political climate surrounding his pending transfer.
Ribadu also said he planned to show up to his office on
December 31, 2007, as usual and would continue to do so )- unless he was
physically blocked — until the effective date of his transfer (February 2008).
Ribadu said, without a doubt, yes, the warrant on Ibori was the seminal action
that made Yar’Adua support the transfer.
He added that he was worried that Yar’Adua was not strong
enough to balance the pressures on him from his inner circle — many he had
already blocked from illicit enrichment The Ambassador expressed to him the
U.S.’s strong concerns over the tenor of events and how unsettling this is
given what appears to be a reversal of Yar’Adua’s strong anti-corruption
messages while in Washington. Coming on the heels of the U.S. visit, this action
has hurt our initial sense of his commitment on these key democracy pillars.
The EFCC Chair was pleased to hear of the international interest in the
situation and added that anything is still possible in terms of a reversal as
Yar’Adua tends to respond to the last person who speaks with him. He thought
pressure from the international community could be useful. Ribadu said if the
transfer prevails then his Lagos deputy, Lamorde, would likely be brought up to
serve as Acting. He then praised the USG training provided by Treasury’s
FinCen, and said whether he was at the EFCC or not, the USG should continue its
efforts to help as his team was dedicated and committed. Ribadu said that the
EFCC needed a few more concrete tools such as a Crime Center, housing a data
base on all criminal activity, and hoped the U.S. would help on this.
Ambassador provided the EFCC Chair with all her contact
information, noted she had a pending weekend response call from the President,
and told him that he had active supporters who would be following this issue,
notwithstanding the Ambassador.
2. (S) Following Yar’Adua’s positive U.S. trip, fairly upbeat
sentiments by Nigerians at year’s end on his tenure, and his own end of year
national address calling on adherence to transparency, not only do we need to
be concerned about this action, but also what appears to be other steps against
the EFCC. Even if Ribadu is gone or if ours or other efforts prevail, there are
potentially other possible actions on the horizon to reduce the EFCC’s prowess
by such as removing others on Ribadu’s team, and merging it with other less
focused and effective entities such as the Independent Corrupt Practices
Commission (ICPC). Whatever his motives, Yar’Adua has made a major political
misstep as his tribunal results loom near. End Summary



